Matt Hardy Criticizes Michael Strahan-RAW Segment

Ryan Clark November 26, 2013 9

Matt Hardy Criticizes Michael Strahan-RAW Segment



RECENT GALLERIES

- PHOTOS: Rollins & Ambrose Debut New Ring Gear!
- PHOTOS: Seth Rollins Debuts New Ring Gear!
- EXCLUSIVE PHOTOS: RAW Script For June 2, 2014!
- PHOTO: Luke Gallows' New Real-Life Wife!
- PHOTOS: Bray Wyatt's Hot Real-Life Sister!
- PHOTO: "Selfie" Of Tessmacher Getting A Massage!
- PHOTO: Brooke Hogan Shows Off Her Hot Body!
- PHOTOS: Candice Michelle's Busty Bikini Shots!
- PHOTO: Stacy Keibler Shows Off Her Baby-Bump!
- PHOTO: Natalya & Her Hot Real-Life Sister!

Former WWE Superstar Matt Hardy questioned the point behind the Michael Strahan segment on MizTV on Monday’s post-Survivor Series edition of RAW in Long Island, New York.

“Can you please explain to me what the Miz-Michael Strahan segment was supposed to accomplish on Raw?,” wrote Hardy on his official Twitter account. “That was good? Or productive?”

Hardy spoke back-and-forth with his fans for a while and then elaborated further. “Yes, have [Strahan] on the show, that’s smart business. But the creative behind his segment was counterproductive and confusing, in my opinion.”

Hardy continued, “A fictional show doesn’t have to be complex. If it sets parameters, stay true to them, makes sense, keeps continuity, it works.”

Hardy concluded, “WWE’s product has to become more sophisticated in an era where TV like Breaking Bad, Walking Dead, & Sons Of Anarchy thrive. The problem is NOT the PG content. It’s the substance of the content and continuity of the product.”

You can follow Matt Hardy on Twitter @MATTHARDYBRAND.


Share This Post and Support WZR!

  • Creature_of_the_Night

    Matt Hardy is spot-on.

    Kudos.

    • x2c

      Proven right?? Proven right??

      Name ONE thing that you’ve been right about, with date and time??

      In order to be right, someone needs to agree with what you’re saying – and so far, no one has. You CAN’T agree with yourself on every post. And if you do, it just means your a dumba$$ with an ego problem who needs a pacifier.

      Oh ya! Who’s right??

      Everyone here has proven time and time again that you’ve been wrong every single time.

      Fuk, you can’t even name three people who say WWE is perfect…

      But don’t even bother responding to this, because you’ll just be proven wrong no matter what you say.

    • Myaaaa

      I almost agreed with you, but then after you said Hardy was spot on, you had to keep flappin your gums, and being you.

      Unless your sole purpose is to be a troll, you should seriously drop the whole martyr thing.

      It really discredits anything you say, even the rare intelligent pieces you have every now and again.

  • Spartacus618

    X2c is spot on

    Kudos

    • Creature_of_the_Night

      Duh

      You should.

      It’s just another one of the profiles you post under.

      As obvious as your names both being gray and can’t click on them.

      Sad.

      Peace.

      • x2c

        WRONG AGAIN!!

        Like I said…

        you’re a dumba$$.

        We’re two separate people.

        And if you don’t believe me, then that’s YOUR fukking problem, not mine.

        FUK… HOW MANY TIMES ARE YOU GOING TO BE WRONG??

  • http://bestdatingsonly.wordpress.com/ anonymous
  • http://bestdatingsonly.wordpress.com/ anonymous
  • http://z4.invisionfree.com/AcerWorld/ Acer

    Personally, I can’t disagree with Matt Hardy. He does make some solid points on that Miz TV segment featuring The Miz, Titus O’Neil, and the special guest host for the night, Michael Strahan. Yeah, the content that WWE pulled out from that night was kinda brutal, and kinda useless too as well where the in-ring segment, probably dragged on and on. WWE needs to smarten up and come up with unique ideas to make the content + segment better. The segment itself, just went a bit too long.

Last 75 Posts in Wrestling News