WWE Network To Launch Early Next Year?, Details

Ryan Clark October 31, 2013 3

WWE Network To Launch Early Next Year?, Details


- PHOTOS: Rollins & Ambrose Debut New Ring Gear!
- PHOTOS: Seth Rollins Debuts New Ring Gear!
- EXCLUSIVE PHOTOS: RAW Script For June 2, 2014!
- PHOTO: Luke Gallows' New Real-Life Wife!
- PHOTOS: Bray Wyatt's Real-Life Sister!
- PHOTO: "Selfie" Of Tessmacher Getting A Massage!
- PHOTO: Brooke Hogan Posts Some New Pics!
- PHOTOS: New Photos Of Candice Michelle!
- PHOTO: Stacy Keibler Shows Off Her Baby-Bump!
- PHOTO: Natalya & Her Real-Life Sister!

Broadcasting & Cable.com reports that Stephanie McMahon revealed that the WWE was targeting a first quarter of 2014 launch for the WWE Network.

McMahon spoke at the TV Summit at New York City Television Week. McMahon spoke with moderator R. Thomas Wumstead that the WWE app is changing the way people watch their programs. She stated, “It’s been downloaded over 8 million times. What we offer is really a revolutionary second screen experience.”

McMahon wouldn’t get into specific plans on the WWE Network, but she said, “We are looking at traditional and nontraditional distribution, and we’re targeting first quarter next year.”

Share This Post and Support WZR!


  1. Creature_of_the_Night October 31, 2013 at 2:44 pm - Reply

    That stupid app —– ugh.

    The stupid network. I hope it does launch and bombs – that will be awesome. What a horrid company.

    Ruined professional wrestling – the junk they do now isn’t wrestling – I seriously can’t watch it anymore – I suffer through 10 to 20 minutes to have a legitimate place to talk, and follow it on the net.

    Some weeks I don’t watch any.

    I’m passionate about what I like and hate – been told before – I don’t generally “like” or “dislike something”. I LOVE something, or I HATE it.

    SO – BFG had 4000 people, so I’m not allowed to like it and furthermore that automatically means WWE is SOOOOO much better and TNA is no good.

    And I definitely can’t like it more?

    And RAW’s sinking numbers are higher, so I automatically have to like it more and that means it’s better.

    Like a lot of garbage no-talent people out there don’t make a lot of money – and a lot of garbage movies don’t make money.

    I’ve explained it a million times and either A. it doesn’t sink into the Universe’s thick skull or B. The Universe just gets off on being a pr*ck on the net.

    Popularity doesn’t equal quality – and I’m not going to like something because it makes money or is more popular.

    I literally have people say – well, more people were there so it means it was better, it did better numbers so that means it’s better.

    What if there are 2 televisions – one is $300 and standard – the other is 3000 and more state of the art, lasts longer, better picture, etc. More of the $300 is sold for many reasons, affordability, etc. Does that mean it’s better than the $3000 tv?

    No – just a small example of how something being more popular, and even making more money – doesn’t mean something is better – how some nimrod could argue with me on that is unfathomable.

    But i will go to my grave saying TNA is 100000000000(infinity) times better than WWE, I like it more, I love TNA actually, AND ROH, and this belief is unshakable, and I don’t give in to “fit in”. Nice ring to that.

    THAT’S what the Universe can’t accept.

    Happy Halloween everyone.

    • Lollieman November 1, 2013 at 8:30 am - Reply

      ∞ <——–Infinity Symbol, incase you didn't know.

  2. anonymous October 31, 2013 at 10:33 pm - Reply

Leave A Response »

Last 75 Posts in Wrestling News